The controversy of “Innocents Muslims” Film - فلم هوليود النجس عن المسلمين وعقيدتهم
Hasan Yahya, Former Professor of Comparative Sociology
Muhammad’s Image in the film
First let me give these facts:
Fact 1. The film’s name is: “Innocents Muslims” 120 minutes.
Fact 2. The film is made at Hollywood, California, USA.
Fact 3. The writer and director is a liberal Israeli-American-Jew.
Fact 4 (doubtful) . His name is Sam Bacile, a liberal Jewish American. – OR may be Nakoula Basseley Nakoula.
Fact 5. Jewish agencies support financing the film. But they deny this fact as usual.
Fact 6: Involving a Copt’s name is only to give possibilities of those who are involved, which increases ambiguity misleading, and makes the truth lost., a role American Jewish media is the master.
Fact 7: Jewish Agencies and Israeli authorities denial of involvement as usual is a lie, just the same as their right in Palestine..
Social analysis: The controversy will divide American citizens into: Liberals defending constitutional (first Amendment-free speech) and opposing views for people’s anarchy of disrespecting religious sacred figures.
Political analysis: Mitt Romney support wars, and it is possibility the film wants to remind Americans of “Muslim terror” forgetting stupidly the questions: WHO STARTS? WHO CAUSES TERROR?
On the Obama side, there is a possibility that Obama will be hurt, if more Americans were killed as a result of the film. But people who deny the cause, must ask the same questions in Romney’s case. WHY? And WHO started? And may be: WHO will be benefited from the whole scheme.
Points were-I believe-over control of anger and rage of Muslims, for example are:
The film in general is a propaganda of sick minded persons against Islam, Muslims and their Basic Beliefs( about God, Muhammad and Qur’an)
The film tells lies and fabrications about the Prophet (Birth-Nasab), in several places, Muhammad was described as Bastard, and with no father, a gay, and crazy about women.
The basic principles of Islam were degraded by insult and ignorance of historical facts.
He mentioned Sahabah Omar Ja’afer and others in defamation.
The film also degraded Ayesha, Hafsa and Khadejah. And claim that (Waraqa bin Nofal) arranged his FALSE prophecy after Khadejah asked him to do something for him.
The film insults Qur’an, the sacred book of Islam.
It is a propaganda of Jewish right in Palestine.
Finally, On old woman says:”Children are slaved and sent to death……after he and his men …….” He does this all in the name of God, (she laughs), and guess what? What God is this? …. Unfair to the people?”
In conclusion: Each one the above facts and audio-visual scenes about the Prophet, his companions and his wives, may force a practicing Muslim to a be martyr to defend his or her belief. This is not a joke. It is a fact. You cannot play games with the people emotional beliefs, and later call them terrorists. The First Constitutional Amendment, or free speech, does not mean anarchy of insulting other’s belief. I strongly agree and understand Religious studies professor Anthea Butler in her tweets on Twitter calling for arresting the man who was responsible for his irrisponsibility, to save American lives abroad, and for distinguishing the historical facts from propagandas of the Jewish-Israel American writer and director. After all, I wonder, stupid and intellectual orientalists when asked: Why Muslims rage? The author of this article does not judge constitutional (1st Amendment )free speech action, but question the consequences of such act, which is real in the case of American Ambassador and other Americans personnel killed and will be, as a result of the stupid free speech (film) idea. This is like drinking , driving, and killing someone. We do not judge drinking or driving, we judge safety or injury of people as a consequence of drink-driving. Got the idea. God bless Marx, who says: “Capitalism carries the seeds of its destruction.” and this type of free speech is one of the many nails in the American civilization coffen. In Arabic a proverb says: “If you don’t feel shy, you do whatever you wish.” Is the film idea is the wish to save Americans? I doubt its success. In fact it causes fatalities of more innocent people.
One may be far more insightful, if we add the preparation of Israel to hit Iran Nuclear arsinal, which the film gives sympathy for Israel after “savegary actions of saving face,” against Americans and Jews. L ook at the case comparatively, if someone rape your wife or sister in front of your eyes, what will be your reaction? The same when you rape someone’s faith alive in front of their faces. Are they responsible of killing the imagined rapist. Anger and revenge is inasane. and insane are innocent in court.
No one knows where consequences of aggression and selfishness for domination, may lead us.
Then as Dante’s conclusion in his “Devine Comedy”
The film ends with this-Muhammad’s Image as in Fire
To see how much the film is UGLY, see this shur!
www.arabamericanencyclopedia.com
The author Books on Amazon at : USA ** France ** UK ** Dutch ** eBay ** Barns&Noble ** dryahyatv ** Europe ** Follow DryahyaTV AT: Youtube **Goooooogle ** on Twitter ** Facebook ** On Linkedin ** On AOL ** On Ezine ** On Yahoo ** On Articlesbase ** On WordPress Hasan Yahya at Amazon and Hasan Yahya‘s Column on world Future Online.
Pingback: The Film: Defamation of ISLAM and Muslim Beliefs NOT Religions-الفلم ضد الإسلام وعقيدتهم وليس ضد الأديان | www.arabamericanencyclopedia.com