Comments on World-News: OSLO Killer who killed 77 from his own people
Prof. Hasan Yahya, former professor of Comparative sociology
Bear with me, the news reported here are selective for new phenomena in world affairs according to moral standards of the writer who is playing the activist role for the truth about social justice and education, if it pays or not.
- The easiest way to live happy: Kill and make apology and you get away with it.
At OSLO, the man who killed 77 people last summer to protest at Muslim immigration to Europe said on Monday he believed he could tell the ideology of his prospective massacre victims by looking at them, and tried to spare one who appeared “right-wing”.
In his court show, Anders Behring Breivik, 33 said:” “To all of those … I want to say I am deeply sorry for what happened,” That’s a human feeling different from monster feeling when he was killing 10 one time, then 17 then….. all 77 innocent souls.
Breivik said he shot most of his victims several times, using the first shot to take them down, then following up with a shot to the head.
Breivik, 33, admits the killings but has pleaded not guilty. He says he was defending his country against Muslim immigrants by setting off a car bomb that killed eight people at government headquarters in Oslo before travelling to the island to carry out the massacre.
In his description of the trauma and how he went on his rampage, gunning down 69 teenagers. “When I make a follow up shot, his (victim’s) cranium bursts and there are brains flowing out. I remember that very well,” Breivik said in an unemotional, matter-of-fact tone. His victims, he said, appeared paralyzed before he shot them. In his words: “I walk towards a group of 10 who have stopped. They have stopped running and just lie down. I go to them and shoot them all to the head.
“It was extremely hard to shoot that first shot, it is contrary to human nature. But after that… it became easier,” he said. “To take a human life is the most extreme you can do, but you weigh that against superior motives.”
Comment: How people look does not give the impression of what they are thinking or what their ideology is. May be this is a new theory in psychology of the insane. But to defend his sanity, the terrorist-defendant, shows how much his theory was corrupt and false as Hitler’s justification of terminating several thousands (or millions in some sources) of Jews.
Thank God, he was a Christian, white and patriotism, from Norway the head of civilization worldwide NOT Muslim from the Middle East. Terrorism and racism has no color or faith or and represent the lower stage of immorality. Finally, he missed the target, to be more famous, the EU leaders or the G8 or G20 are more important as policy makers, to publicize his ideology, and have more appeal to the media. In any case, what happened is happened as he said, but he will feel more sorrow of miscalculation of the results. Immigrants will continue to come and become stronger. They may have many (insane which he resist to be) people like him. No body knows. My advice to him, next time, if he escaped persecution, which is possible (because national occasions are rolling), my advice for him is to follow Israeli Mosad in terminating heads of the Palestinian resistance against occupied forces in Palestine, wherever they are, no one introduced them to court, instead they appraise what they have done, unlike his case. So long.
The News taken from many Sources.
The wrtiter is a former professor of comparative sociology.
** Note for readers: If you liked this, please let other people know about it. You may contact the writer using this site. Thank you!
معظمهم لا يقرأون وأكثرهم لا يفكرون ولا يقدرون ولا يخططون
حسبي الله ونعم الوكيل